Log in

No account? Create an account
an albuquerque not animate be armada. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Okrzyki, przyjaciel!

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

October 6th, 2003

LOST IN TRANSLATION [Oct. 6th, 2003|08:26 am]
Okrzyki, przyjaciel!
I guess I'm coming late to the game after reviews by optic here and xmutex there...

But I'll throw in my 2 cents. I really enjoyed it, for a number of reasons, which I shall number:

1. Bill Murray. His persona in this movie is like a muted Morley's Ghost -- you can see the weight of the chains binding him. The humor in his character seems damped by this weight, and that it survives seems almost heroic.
2. Tokyo. Never been, want to go. Beautifully photographed. xmutex kvetsched about repetitiveness in showing scenes of the city, but it's there intentionally. It's a rhythm in the structure of the movie. But the setting is there because of Coppola's obvious affection for it; when you don't have context or understanding of something one apprehends it's surface more fully, and what better medium for exploring an alluring and alien surface than film.
3. The 'film-student-esque' touches. Scarlett Johanssen's butt in pink underwear opens the movie in a long shot that's almost architectural. The cyclic pattern of bedroom city television bar as a formal device. The pared down, minimalist plot and dialog. The way Coppola works with a small palette of repeated elements, echoed in the scene where Charlotte joins the flower arranging class. The end where he speaks in her ear and you can't hear what he's saying, as though Coppola respects their privacy.
4. Scarlett herself, who strikes the right tone for her character; she conveys the beauty of youth combined with a sense that she's not fully formed. The way she contrasts with Murray, who looks artfully wrecked and battered.
5. The relationship they form is unlike any I've seen in movies, and belies the prurience one would expect. The depth with which they affect each other without it becoming sexual is a real novelty. As someone who is older, and has important friendships with younger women that aren't sexual or romantic, I like seeing this on screen. It shows a man over 45 who isn't a prurient creep around young women.

Is it a perfect movie? Nah. A perfect movie doesn't come so perfectly arranged for your deconstruction. Perfect movies hoist you out of your attention to their artifice and make you forget they're movies. "Lost In Translation" is as pretty and neat as lunch from a Bento Box, and points to great things in the future from Coppola, but it's not a masterpiece. But it was a joy to watch and makes most of the other movies that have come this year look tawdry and small.
linkpost comment

More Lost In Translation [Oct. 6th, 2003|09:15 am]
Okrzyki, przyjaciel!
My favorite review from IMDB.COM:

Donnyzona@aol.com write, "This was a great movie about an older man, Bill Murry who finds a way to escape boredom by palling around with the young Charlotte. The movie is good and Charlotte is very very pretty. The best part of the movie was seeing what Japan is like!! Tokyo is such a mysterious place. The acting was great and the way Bill contained himself was the best. He whispered to the woman at the end. Ah yes, the whisper. He whispered that he really enjoyed making Ghostbusters with Dan Akryod."
linkpost comment

super-recal-ifornication ahnold-ally-doosky [Oct. 6th, 2003|06:56 pm]
Okrzyki, przyjaciel!
I got my money's worth out of my basic cable tonight, watching Ann Coulter defend Arnold Schwarzenegger. The best part is she didn't really defend him. She just rolled her eyes and said that the L A Times was a tool of the Democratic Party. By the way, if you have a strong stomach you can read her columns on line. Her writing is so awful that I can't imagine anyone claiming her as a paradigm of their political philosophy, even if she is a skinny, horsey-looking blonde. She seems to think, among other things, that she scores big when she accuses John Kerry of looking French.

What really, truly mystifies me about all the Groper-gate stuff is that I read about it in Salon.com months ago. Even the 'admiring Hitler' comments. And the guys on CNN are shocked that this is 'coming out' right before the election. Virtually everything that's blowing up now about him was apparently well known before he even announced he was going to run.

I just need to not watch the news, and watch old movies instead. I've got a 30 year record of bitching about conditions in the world and not doing anything about it; to follow it as closely as I do just makes me feel even more powerless and ineffectual.
link4 comments|post comment

[ viewing | October 6th, 2003 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]